PROJECTTINKER
[ 04 ]parametric drawings

Blueprints, generated from your cube

Set a cube size and these redraw. The flywheel is not a guess — it is sized backwards from the physics: work out the angular momentum the wheel must store to catch your target lean, cap the speed at something a hobby motor actually reaches, and the bolt count falls out. Every drawing downloads as SVG.

Flywheel
Frame, one face
Motor mount
Pivot corner
Signal path

Cut list [ live ]

How the flywheel gets sized [ backwards ]

Most builds pick a flywheel that looks about right and then discover the motor cannot use it. This works the other way round:

  1. From cube size and mass, compute the pendulum inertia about the balancing edge and the gravity torque at your target lean.
  2. From those, the angular momentum the wheel must be able to store to arrest a fall from that lean: H = √(2·Jp·M·g·l·(1−cos θ)).
  3. Cap wheel speed at 2000 rpm — above that, hobby gimbal motors run out of voltage headroom. Required inertia is then J = H / ω.
  4. Compute one bolt's mass from its geometry, work out how many at the bolt-circle radius reach that inertia, and round.

So the bolt count on the drawing is a physics result, not a style choice. Change the target lean and watch it move.

What these drawings are and are not. They are dimensioned concept drawings to build and check against — correct in proportion, in the derived engineering numbers, and in the relationships between parts. They are not a manufacturing package: no tolerances, no fits, no fastener callouts beyond thread size, and the motor bolt circle is an input because it differs per motor. Measure your actual motor before committing. The mass estimate assumes a printed shell at roughly 35% solid plus typical motor, electronics and battery weights — override it the moment you can put the real thing on scales.